Drug Master Files (DMFs)

Featured In: Regulatory News

By Federal Drug Administration Tuesday, February 2, 2010

newsvine diigo google
slashdot
Share
Loading...

Drug Master Files (DMFs)

There is no requirement to file DMFs in electronic format. Paper DMFs will continue to be accepted. If this policy changes there will be advance notification.

This site contains lists of Drug Master Files (DMFs) as well as information concerning submission of DMFs. The list is updated quarterly, although there may be delays of up to a month. See below for information regarding the current DMF Guideline.

QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ABOUT DMFs

Please address ALL comments or questions regarding DMFs to dmfquestion@cder.fda.gov. All inquiries MUST have an entry in the "Subject" field of the e-mail. Due to concerns about viruses and the amount of "spam" received by this account, e-mails with subject fields that are blank or contain meaningless text strings or contain only question marks will not be opened.  If the inquiry concerns a specific DMF the DMF number should be in the subject field of the message.

Other inquiries unrelated to DMFs should go to druginfo@fda.hhs.gov.

The list of DMFs is current as of January 29, 2010, through DMF 23453. Changes to the DMF activity status, DMF type, holder name, and subject made since the last update of October 31, 2009 are included.

People who downloaded the previous list (through DMF 23193 October 31, 2009) and do not wish to download the entire updated lists can use the following lists:

1. New DMFs since the last list.
2. A list of changes in DMF activity status, DMF type, holder name, and subject.

The lists are available in Microsoft Excel and in ASCII (tab-delimited). Please note that only ACTIVE DMFs have been sorted into different types.

For the Excel files, the following lists are provided as different worksheets within one Excel file.

  • All DMFs
  • Active DMFs
  • Active Type II DMFs
  • Active Type III DMFs
  • Active Type IV DMFs
  • Active Type V DMFs

The following lists are still provided as separate files.

The types of DMFs are:

  • Type I Manufacturing Site, Facilities, Operating Procedures, and Personnel (no longer applicable)
  • Type II Drug Substance, Drug Substance Intermediate, and Material Used in Their Preparation, or Drug Product
  • Type III Packaging Material
  • Type IV Excipient, Colorant, Flavor, Essence, or Material Used in Their Preparation
  • Type V FDA Accepted Reference Information

“A” = Active. This means that the DMF was found acceptable for filing, administratively, and is up-to-date.
“I” = Inactive
“N” = Not an assigned number
“P” = DMF Pending Filing Review

INACTIVE STATUS OF DMFs

There are three reasons for a DMF to be listed as INACTIVE:

  1. CLOSED BY THE HOLDER: The holder requested that the DMF be closed (or retired, closed, inactivated, or withdrawn.)
  2. CLOSED BY THE FDA: The holder did not respond to an Overdue Notification Letter within 90 days to update the DMF.
  3. OVERDUE FOR UPDATE: For DMFs submitted before December 31, 2006, a DMF is considered OVERDUE FOR UPDATE when there have been no technical amendments or annual reports submitted since that date.

Note that submission of a Letter of Authorization or an Administrative amendment (see below) is not sufficient to update a DMF.

Note that the status “INACTIVE” in the list does not distinguish among the reasons listed above.

According to the regulations regarding DMFs (21 CFR 314.420(c)):

“Any addition, change, or deletion of information in a drug master file (except the list required under paragraph (d) of this section) is required to be submitted in two copies and to describe by name, reference number, volume, and page number the information affected in the drug master file.”

As discussed in the "Guideline for Drug Master Files" (September 1989), DMF holders should update their DMFs annually (see below under Annual Reports).

Overdue Notification Letters:  FDA is in the process of sending “Overdue Notification Letters” (ONLs) to DMF holders for DMFs that are OVERDUE FOR UPDATE (see above). If a DMF holder does not respond to this letter within 90 days, the DMF will be considered “CLOSED BY THE FDA.” It will then be RETIRED.

Note that there is a backlog in sending out ONLs. DMF holders can forestall the sending of an ONL by updating their DMFs, following the procedure below under “Retaining the Activity of a DMF.” Some DMFs may be listed as inactive which are, in fact, still active. Every effort will be made to correct any errors.

Retirement of DMFs

A DMF can be RETIRED ONLY if it has been CLOSED BY THE FDA or CLOSED BY THE HOLDER. A RETIRED DMF is unavailable for review.

Retaining the Activity of a DMF

A DMF holder that wants to retain the activity of a DMF that is listed as Inactive and that was not CLOSED BY THE HOLDER or CLOSED BY THE FDA should submit an Annual Report (two copies).  This process should also be used to respond to an ONL:

The cover letter should specify that it is an “Annual Report.”  If other types of information are provided in addition to the Annual Report, these should be listed in the cover letter.  See specific information below.

The Annual Report should contain:

1. One of the following

  • Date(s) of the most recent amendment(s) reporting changes

Or

  • A statement that no amendments have been submitted since the last Annual Report.

2. One of the following:

  • A complete list of all parties authorized to make reference to the DMF, identifying by name, reference number, volume, date, and page number the information that each person is authorized to incorporate

Or

  • A statement that no changes have been made to the list of Authorized Parties since the last Annual Report.

Or

  • A statement that there are no Authorized Parties.

3. List of all parties whose authorization has been withdrawn

The Annual Report may contain new technical and/or administrative information provided the cover letter specifies the types of information being submitted.  The types of information should be specified as listed below:

There may be a lag time between closure of a DMF (either by lack of timely response to an ONL or closure by the holder) and its being RETIRED by FDA. DMF holders who wish to reactivate a CLOSED DMF should contact dmfquestion@cder.fda.gov to determine whether the DMF has been RETIRED by FDA.

GUIDANCES

 Guideline for Drug Master Files The version posted on the web is the current version. Note that the address for submitting DMF documentation to the FDA in the Guidance has been superseded by the Beltsville address below. Please address question regarding the DMF Guideline to dmfquestion@cder.fda.gov.

Note: FDA regulations require that all submissions to INDs and NDAs that are in a foreign language have “complete and accurate translations.” The same is true for DMFs. A “certified” translation is not required.

MORE INFORMATION ABOUT DMFs

See Presentation from Art Shaw

The recommendations in the DMF Guidance are, in general, still applicable. However the information below provides additional information or clarification of the recommendations in the Guidance. This information provided below falls into three categories

Category 1: Recommendations that are no longer applicable due to changes in regulations or guidances.
Category 2: Additional clarification of recommendations in the Guidance.
Category 3: New information for aspects of DMF filing that were not in effect when the Guidance was written.

Address for Filing Original DMFs and Subsequent DMF Documents (Category 3)

Food and Drug Administration
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Central Document Room
5901-B Ammendale Road
Beltsville MD 20705-1266

Format and Content of the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Section of an Application (Category 1)

The “Guideline for the Format and Content of the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Section of an Application” cited in the DMF Guidance has been withdrawn. DMFs may be submitted following the format recommended in the "Guidance for Industry M4Q: The CTD - Quality".

TYPES OF DMFs

Type I DMFs (Category 1)
Type I DMFs are no longer accepted per a Final Rule published January 12, 2000 (65 FR 1776). See Type V DMFs below.

Holders of Type II, III, and IV DMFs should not place information regarding facilities, personnel or operating procedures in these DMFs. Only the addresses of the DMF holder and manufacturing site and contact personnel should be submitted. See Administrative Information in a DMF.

Type II DMFs (Category 1)

Drug Substance

Type II DMFs may be submitted in the format for "Drug substance" in the "Guidance for Industry M4Q: The CTD - Quality".(Category 3) Drug Substance:

See the current Guideline for Submitting Supporting Documentation in Drug Applications for the Manufacture of Drug Substances.

For Type II DMFs filed in CTD-Q format, Module 2 is expected.

Drug Product:  See the Guideline For Submitting Supporting Documentation In Drug Applications For The Manufacture Of Drug Products.

Type III DMFs (Category 1)

The applicable Guidance for Type III DMFs is the “Guidance for Industry: Container Closure Systems for Packaging Human Drugs and Biologics: CHEMISTRY, MANUFACTURING, AND CONTROLS DOCUMENTATION” and Questions and Answers. (Category 3)

 Type V DMFs (Category 3)

The following types of DMFs may be filed as Type V DMFs without requesting prior clearance from FDA.

For other submissions as Type V DMFs the holder must request permission from FDA before filing a Type V DMF.  Prospective Type V DMF holders may send their request to dmfquestion@cder.fda.gov, explaining the necessity for filing the information in a Type V DMF.

Administrative Information in a DMF (Category 3)

The only elements of the administrative information that should be in a DMF are:

  • The name and address of the holder
  • The name and address of manufacturing facility
  • For the contact person:
    • Name
    • Address
    • Telephone number
    • Fax number
    • E-mail address

The appointment of an Agent is optional. See discussion below under “Agents”

Submission of Amendments, Annual Reports, and Letters of Authorization (Category 3)

To facilitate processing of documents that are submitted to an existing DMF, please list the contents of the document in bold type on the transmittal letter. More than one document category/subcategory can be used. Please use the following as a guide.

  • Category: Quality

Subcategory under Quality Category

  • New item:  Additional item e.g. flavor added to a multi-item DMF
  • Controls Information
  • Dissolution Data*
  • Facility Information
  • Formulation Information
  • Manufacture Information
  • Microbiology Information
  • New Strength*
  • Packaging Information
  • Stability Information

SOURCE

Join the Discussion
Rate Article:  Average 0 out of 5
register or log in to comment on this article!

0 Comments

Add Comment

Text Only 2000 character limit

Page 1 of 1

Research Exchange

Microplate Reader Test Plates Ensure Reliable Microplate Reader Operation

Aug 20

Use of a certified test plate can help to increase efficiency when calibrating microplate readers.

Automated Imaging Assisted Cell Line Development

Aug 19

Improve titer, quality and speed in cell line development.

New Frontiers: The Changing World of Biospecimen Collection and Management

Jul 30

The growth of biomarker research and personalized medicine requires more unified and large-scale software systems to track biological materials.

Optical Imaging in Stem Cell Research

Jun 1

Developing sensitive, non-invasive technologies to monitor engraftment in vivo is essential to accelerate the clinical implementation of cell therapies.

Step up to the MIQE

Mar 30

Over the years, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has evolved into a readily automated, high throughput quantitative technology. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) has become the industry standard for the detection and quantification of nucleic acids for multiple application, including quantification of RNA levels. But a lack of consensus among researchers on how to best perform and interpret qPCR experiments presents a major hurdle for advancement of the technology. This problem is exacerbated by insufficient experimental detail in published work, which impedes the ability of others to accurately evaluate or replicate reported results.

Fast Optimization of a Multiplex Influenza Identification Panel Using a Thermal Gradient

Mar 30

The year 2009 was marked by the emergence of a novel influenza A (H1N1) virus that infects humans. There is a need to identify the different strains of influenza virus for purposes of monitoring the H1N1 strain pandemic and for other epidemiological and scientific purposes.

Advantages of Monolithic Laser Combiner Technology in Confocal Microscopy Systems

Jan 6

Fluorescence microscopy techniques require a reliable light source at the desired wavelength or wavelengths, with minimal downtime for maintenance and alignment. Lasers are a popular light source, although the alignment and upkeep of laser combiners is a time-consuming prospect for many users.

Size-Exclusion Chromatography for Purification of Biomolecules

Dec 2 2009

Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) is a popular method to separate biomolecules based on their size. Primarily, it is applied to the separation of biopolymers such as proteins and nucleic acids, i.e. water-soluble polymers.

Using the Tecan Genesis Workstation to Automate a Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) Immunoassay

Mar 11

The poster describe the process involved in automating a Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) immunoassay developed to measure relative concentrations of serum antibodies against Tetanus (TT), Sperm Whale Myoglobin (SWM) and Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) in KLH-immunized volunteers.

Ensuring Quality in Assays Performed with Automated Liquid Handlers

Feb 2

The focus of this presentation is to highlight the need of ensuring quality in important assays performed with automated liquid handlers. Nearly all assays performed within a laboratory are volume-dependent. In turn, all concentrations of biological and chemical components in these assays, as well as the associated dilution protocols, are volume-dependent. Because analyte concentration is volume-dependent, an assay’s results might be falsely interpreted if liquid handler variability and inaccuracies are unknown or if the system(s) go unchecked for a long period.

Inkjet System for Protein Crystallography

Feb 1

X-ray crystallography is used routinely by scientists to obtain the three dimensional structure of a biological molecule of interest.Such information can be used to determine how a pharmaceutical interacts with a protein target and what changes might improve functionality. However, the crystallization of macromolecules still remains a serious hindrance in structural determination despite impressive advances in screening methods and technologies.

Attention Deficit & Hyperactivity in a Drosophila Memory Mutant

Attention Deficit & Hyperactivity in a Drosophila Memory Mutant

Nov 9 2009

Action selection is modulated by external stimuli either directly or via memory retrieval. In a constantly changing environment, animals have evolved attention-like processes to effectively filter the incoming sensory stream. These attention-like processes, in turn, are modulated by memory. The neurobiological nature of how attention, action selection and memory are inter-connected is unknown. We describe here new phenotypes of the memory mutant radish in the fruit fly Drosophila.

Efficient Bayesian approach for multilocus association mapping including gene-gene interactions.

2 hours ago

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of large-scale genotyping methods that can be utilized in genome-wide association (GWA) studies for deciphering complex diseases, statistical genetics has been posed with a tremendous challenge of how to most...

Influenza A/pandemic 2009/H1N1 in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a potentially catastrophic problem in a vulnerable population.

3 hours ago

We describe Influenza A/pandemic 2009/H1N1 in two allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients. The main presentation in both cases consisted of flu-like symptoms manifesting as, fever, arthralgias and myalgias. The virus was isolated in one case...

Outcomes of matched sibling and alternative donor stem cell transplantation for 26 children with severe aplastic anemia.

3 hours ago

In this study, we reported the outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as a treatment modality for pediatric patients admitted over the past 20 years in a single institute. From January 1989 to January 2007, 26 patients with a median age of 8...

Structural Interpretation in Composite Systems Using Powder X-ray Diffraction: Applications of Error Propagation to the Pair Distribution Function.

3 hours ago

PURPOSE: To develop a method for drawing statistical inferences from differences between multiple experimental pair distribution function (PDF) transforms of powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) data. METHODS: The appropriate treatment of initial PXRD error estimates...

Prokariotic Cell Collection in Denmark

Nov 6 2009

I would like to know about a prokariotic cell collection in Denmark. Is there a cell bank in this country? I need a Lactobacillus strain for a fermentation assay and this information about the bank is very helpful for me.

Request for Entries

Oct 16 2009

Ask the Experts is your chance to get the answers to questions on applications, materials, methods, processes, and technologies. Email you question to bst_web@advantagemedia.com, and the editors of Bioscience Technology will find an appropriate expert to answer it. Watch this space in the future to see the questions your colleagues are posting.          

STAY INFORMED: SUBSCRIBE TO

Magazine and E-mail Newsletters

Loading...
E-mail:   

MULTIMEDIA

Video:

Viewing SureFocus Slides

Jun 11

A demonstration of SureFocus Microscope Slides in the review of AFB Smears. SureFocus Slides are a patent-pending breakthrough in tuberculosis detection, as their fluorescent staining circle remains visible during review, Fluorescence Microscopy.

Podcasts:

Allen Institute for Brain Research

Allen Institute for Brain Research

Oct 14 2009

Discussed in this interview are both the mouse brain project and the human cortex project with an emphasis on the importance of these projects to neuroscience research.